Legal Reasoning of the Constitutional Court Verdict Number 25/PUU-XX/2022 on the State Capital Law According to Social Justice Value
ABSTRACT Purpose of the study: This study analyzes the legal reasoning of the Constitutional Court judges in deciding the judicial review Number 25/PUU-XX/2022 against Law Number 3 of 2022 concerning the State Capital (Undang-Undang Ibu Kota Negara/State Capital Law), as well as analyzed based on so...
محفوظ في:
المؤلفون الرئيسيون: | Farid, Achmad Miftah Farid, Nanik, Nanik Prasetyoningsih |
---|---|
التنسيق: | UMS Journal (OJS) |
اللغة: | eng |
منشور في: |
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
2023
|
الموضوعات: | |
الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | https://journals2.ums.ac.id/index.php/jurisprudence/article/view/1285 |
الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
مواد مشابهة
-
Doubting the Impartiality: Constitutional Court Judges and Conflict of Interest
حسب: Rishan, Idul
منشور في: (2022) -
Constitutional Court Decision Number 23/PUU-XIX/2021: Analysis of Judges' Considerations Is It Permissible to Take Cassation Against Decisions to Postpone Debt Payment Obligations?
حسب: Yitawati, Krista, وآخرون
منشور في: (2022) -
Dissenting Opinion on the Constitutionality of Capital Punishment for Narcotics Crime
حسب: Palevo, Ernesto, وآخرون
منشور في: (2023) -
Legal Research on The Return of State Financial Losses Through Additional Punishment of Restitution Payments Based on Judge's Consideration (Comparative Study Between Indonesia and South Africa)
حسب: Jaco Barkhuizen, وآخرون
منشور في: (2023) -
Legal Reasoning of a Judge’s Dissenting Opinion in the Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 1/PUU-VIII/2010 Against the Judicial Review of Law No. 3 of 1997 on Juvenile Courts
حسب: Haq, Hilman Syahrial, وآخرون
منشور في: (2023)