Legal Reasoning of a Judge’s Dissenting Opinion in the Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 1/PUU-VIII/2010 Against the Judicial Review of Law No. 3 of 1997 on Juvenile Courts

• Những tác giả chính: Haq, Hilman Syahrial, Pradnyawan, Sofyan Wimbo Agung, Rachman, M Taufik, Yanto, Edi, Dewi, Anies Prima, Sybelle, Jan Alizea
• Định dạng: UMS Journal (OJS)
• Ngôn ngữ: eng
• Được phát hành: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta 2023
• Những chủ đề: Constitutional Court; Juvenile Court; dissenting opinion; judicial review; Legal Reasoning; Mahkamah Konstitusi; Pengadilan Anak; Dissenting Opinion; Peninjauan Kembali; Penalaran Hukum
• Truy cập trực tuyến: https://journals2.ums.ac.id/index.php/jurisprudence/article/view/1309

ABSTRACT Purpose of the study: This paper aims to analyze the judicial considerations of the dissenting opinion of Constitutional Court judge member Akil Mochtar on Constitutional Court No. 1/PUU-VIII/2010 Against the Judicial Review of Law No. 3 of 1997 on Juvenile Courts. Methodology: This normat...