Legal Reasoning of a Judge’s Dissenting Opinion in the Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 1/PUU-VIII/2010 Against the Judicial Review of Law No. 3 of 1997 on Juvenile Courts

Legal Reasoning of a Judge’s Dissenting Opinion in the Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 1/PUU-VIII/2010 Against the Judicial Review of Law No. 3 of 1997 on Juvenile Courts

ABSTRACT Purpose of the study: This paper aims to analyze the judicial considerations of the dissenting opinion of Constitutional Court judge member Akil Mochtar on Constitutional Court No. 1/PUU-VIII/2010 Against the Judicial Review of Law No. 3 of 1997 on Juvenile Courts. Methodology: This normat...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Hlavní autoři: Haq, Hilman Syahrial, Pradnyawan, Sofyan Wimbo Agung, Rachman, M Taufik, Yanto, Edi, Dewi, Anies Prima, Sybelle, Jan Alizea
Médium: UMS Journal (OJS)
Jazyk:eng
Vydáno: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta 2023
Témata:
Constitutional Court
Juvenile Court
dissenting opinion
judicial review
Legal Reasoning
Mahkamah Konstitusi
Pengadilan Anak
Dissenting Opinion
Peninjauan Kembali
Penalaran Hukum
On-line přístup:https://journals2.ums.ac.id/index.php/jurisprudence/article/view/1309
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!

Internet

https://journals2.ums.ac.id/index.php/jurisprudence/article/view/1309

Podobné jednotky