Legal Reasoning of a Judge’s Dissenting Opinion in the Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 1/PUU-VIII/2010 Against the Judicial Review of Law No. 3 of 1997 on Juvenile Courts

Legal Reasoning of a Judge’s Dissenting Opinion in the Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 1/PUU-VIII/2010 Against the Judicial Review of Law No. 3 of 1997 on Juvenile Courts

ABSTRACT Purpose of the study: This paper aims to analyze the judicial considerations of the dissenting opinion of Constitutional Court judge member Akil Mochtar on Constitutional Court No. 1/PUU-VIII/2010 Against the Judicial Review of Law No. 3 of 1997 on Juvenile Courts. Methodology: This normat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Haq, Hilman Syahrial, Pradnyawan, Sofyan Wimbo Agung, Rachman, M Taufik, Yanto, Edi, Dewi, Anies Prima, Sybelle, Jan Alizea
Format: UMS Journal (OJS)
Language:eng
Published: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta 2023
Subjects:
Constitutional Court
Juvenile Court
dissenting opinion
judicial review
Legal Reasoning
Mahkamah Konstitusi
Pengadilan Anak
Dissenting Opinion
Peninjauan Kembali
Penalaran Hukum
Online Access:https://journals2.ums.ac.id/index.php/jurisprudence/article/view/1309
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Similar Items