Legal Reasoning of the Constitutional Court Verdict Number 25/PUU-XX/2022 on the State Capital Law According to Social Justice Value
ABSTRACT Purpose of the study: This study analyzes the legal reasoning of the Constitutional Court judges in deciding the judicial review Number 25/PUU-XX/2022 against Law Number 3 of 2022 concerning the State Capital (Undang-Undang Ibu Kota Negara/State Capital Law), as well as analyzed based on so...
Salvato in:
Autori principali: | Farid, Achmad Miftah Farid, Nanik, Nanik Prasetyoningsih |
---|---|
Natura: | UMS Journal (OJS) |
Lingua: | eng |
Pubblicazione: |
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
2023
|
Soggetti: | |
Accesso online: | https://journals2.ums.ac.id/index.php/jurisprudence/article/view/1285 |
Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
Documenti analoghi
Documenti analoghi
-
Doubting the Impartiality: Constitutional Court Judges and Conflict of Interest
di: Rishan, Idul
Pubblicazione: (2022) -
Constitutional Court Decision Number 23/PUU-XIX/2021: Analysis of Judges' Considerations Is It Permissible to Take Cassation Against Decisions to Postpone Debt Payment Obligations?
di: Yitawati, Krista, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2022) -
Dissenting Opinion on the Constitutionality of Capital Punishment for Narcotics Crime
di: Palevo, Ernesto, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2023) -
Legal Research on The Return of State Financial Losses Through Additional Punishment of Restitution Payments Based on Judge's Consideration (Comparative Study Between Indonesia and South Africa)
di: Jaco Barkhuizen, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2023) -
Legal Reasoning of a Judge’s Dissenting Opinion in the Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 1/PUU-VIII/2010 Against the Judicial Review of Law No. 3 of 1997 on Juvenile Courts
di: Haq, Hilman Syahrial, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2023)