Legal Reasoning of the Constitutional Court Verdict Number 25/PUU-XX/2022 on the State Capital Law According to Social Justice Value
ABSTRACT Purpose of the study: This study analyzes the legal reasoning of the Constitutional Court judges in deciding the judicial review Number 25/PUU-XX/2022 against Law Number 3 of 2022 concerning the State Capital (Undang-Undang Ibu Kota Negara/State Capital Law), as well as analyzed based on so...
Gardado en:
Main Authors: | Farid, Achmad Miftah Farid, Nanik, Nanik Prasetyoningsih |
---|---|
Formato: | UMS Journal (OJS) |
Idioma: | eng |
Publicado: |
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Acceso en liña: | https://journals2.ums.ac.id/index.php/jurisprudence/article/view/1285 |
Tags: |
Engadir etiqueta
Sen Etiquetas, Sexa o primeiro en etiquetar este rexistro!
|
Títulos similares
-
Doubting the Impartiality: Constitutional Court Judges and Conflict of Interest
por: Rishan, Idul
Publicado: (2022) -
Constitutional Court Decision Number 23/PUU-XIX/2021: Analysis of Judges' Considerations Is It Permissible to Take Cassation Against Decisions to Postpone Debt Payment Obligations?
por: Yitawati, Krista, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Dissenting Opinion on the Constitutionality of Capital Punishment for Narcotics Crime
por: Palevo, Ernesto, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Legal Research on The Return of State Financial Losses Through Additional Punishment of Restitution Payments Based on Judge's Consideration (Comparative Study Between Indonesia and South Africa)
por: Jaco Barkhuizen, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Legal Reasoning of a Judge’s Dissenting Opinion in the Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 1/PUU-VIII/2010 Against the Judicial Review of Law No. 3 of 1997 on Juvenile Courts
por: Haq, Hilman Syahrial, et al.
Publicado: (2023)