Analysis of the Reasons for the Judge's Decision Which Relieves Defendants in Corruption Cases

Purpose of the study: This research article aims to explain the analysis of several reasons for the judge's decision which is considered to lighten the defendant in corruption cases in Indonesia.  Methodology: This study used a normative research method with a philosophical approach. Results:...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: prasetyo, Yogi, Ferry Irawan Febriansyah, Alfalachu Indiantoro, Aries Isnandar, Ucuk Agiyanto
Format: UMS Journal (OJS)
Langue:eng
Publié: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta 2022
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:https://journals2.ums.ac.id/index.php/jurisprudence/article/view/1008
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1805342448200712192
author prasetyo, Yogi
Ferry Irawan Febriansyah
Alfalachu Indiantoro
Aries Isnandar
Ucuk Agiyanto
author_facet prasetyo, Yogi
Ferry Irawan Febriansyah
Alfalachu Indiantoro
Aries Isnandar
Ucuk Agiyanto
author_sort prasetyo, Yogi
collection OJS
description Purpose of the study: This research article aims to explain the analysis of several reasons for the judge's decision which is considered to lighten the defendant in corruption cases in Indonesia.  Methodology: This study used a normative research method with a philosophical approach. Results: The results of this study indicate that judges continue to impose light sanctions on state officials who are accused of corruption cases for various reasons that can be taken into consideration. The following is an analysis of some of these reasons: have never been punished; be honest and be kind; have family responsibilities; refund corrupted money; incorrect application of the law; have no authority; motivated by other people; have a sense of justice; serve the community; get public scorn; and refrain from engaging in corrupt behavior. Applications of this study: Theoretically, academics can use this research to add and develop their knowledge of the law. As for practitioners, especially judges, this research can be used as material for conclusions and considerations when making decisions in corruption cases, so that efforts to eradicate corruption can definitely be achieved. Novelty/Originality of this study: The corruption issue in Indonesia is influenced by the judge's decision in addition to the country’s bad bureaucratic culture. The low judge's decision on corruption cases can also affect the number of state officials who commit acts of corruption. Several reasons that could influence the judge's decision to reduce the corruptors’ sentences. In order to find a true legal truth, it would be useful to study the judge’s reasoning for reducing the corruptor’s punishment because the judge's decision is the most decisive stage in the legal status and fate of the defendant. This is why it is critical to do a more in-depth review of the law in order to ensure that it continues to operate as intended
format UMS Journal (OJS)
id oai:ojs2.journals2.ums.ac.id:article-1008
institution Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
language eng
publishDate 2022
publisher Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
record_format ojs
spelling oai:ojs2.journals2.ums.ac.id:article-1008 Analysis of the Reasons for the Judge's Decision Which Relieves Defendants in Corruption Cases prasetyo, Yogi Ferry Irawan Febriansyah Alfalachu Indiantoro Aries Isnandar Ucuk Agiyanto reasons for mitigating judge's decision corruption Purpose of the study: This research article aims to explain the analysis of several reasons for the judge's decision which is considered to lighten the defendant in corruption cases in Indonesia.  Methodology: This study used a normative research method with a philosophical approach. Results: The results of this study indicate that judges continue to impose light sanctions on state officials who are accused of corruption cases for various reasons that can be taken into consideration. The following is an analysis of some of these reasons: have never been punished; be honest and be kind; have family responsibilities; refund corrupted money; incorrect application of the law; have no authority; motivated by other people; have a sense of justice; serve the community; get public scorn; and refrain from engaging in corrupt behavior. Applications of this study: Theoretically, academics can use this research to add and develop their knowledge of the law. As for practitioners, especially judges, this research can be used as material for conclusions and considerations when making decisions in corruption cases, so that efforts to eradicate corruption can definitely be achieved. Novelty/Originality of this study: The corruption issue in Indonesia is influenced by the judge's decision in addition to the country’s bad bureaucratic culture. The low judge's decision on corruption cases can also affect the number of state officials who commit acts of corruption. Several reasons that could influence the judge's decision to reduce the corruptors’ sentences. In order to find a true legal truth, it would be useful to study the judge’s reasoning for reducing the corruptor’s punishment because the judge's decision is the most decisive stage in the legal status and fate of the defendant. This is why it is critical to do a more in-depth review of the law in order to ensure that it continues to operate as intended Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta 2022-10-31 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article application/pdf https://journals2.ums.ac.id/index.php/jurisprudence/article/view/1008 10.23917/jurisprudence.v12i1.1008 Jurnal Jurisprudence; Vol. 12, No. 1, June 2022 ; 46-70 2549-5615 1829-5045 eng https://journals2.ums.ac.id/index.php/jurisprudence/article/view/1008/348 Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Jurisprudence https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle reasons for mitigating
judge's decision
corruption
prasetyo, Yogi
Ferry Irawan Febriansyah
Alfalachu Indiantoro
Aries Isnandar
Ucuk Agiyanto
Analysis of the Reasons for the Judge's Decision Which Relieves Defendants in Corruption Cases
title Analysis of the Reasons for the Judge's Decision Which Relieves Defendants in Corruption Cases
title_full Analysis of the Reasons for the Judge's Decision Which Relieves Defendants in Corruption Cases
title_fullStr Analysis of the Reasons for the Judge's Decision Which Relieves Defendants in Corruption Cases
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the Reasons for the Judge's Decision Which Relieves Defendants in Corruption Cases
title_short Analysis of the Reasons for the Judge's Decision Which Relieves Defendants in Corruption Cases
title_sort analysis of the reasons for the judge s decision which relieves defendants in corruption cases
topic reasons for mitigating
judge's decision
corruption
topic_facet reasons for mitigating
judge's decision
corruption
url https://journals2.ums.ac.id/index.php/jurisprudence/article/view/1008
work_keys_str_mv AT prasetyoyogi analysisofthereasonsforthejudgesdecisionwhichrelievesdefendantsincorruptioncases
AT ferryirawanfebriansyah analysisofthereasonsforthejudgesdecisionwhichrelievesdefendantsincorruptioncases
AT alfalachuindiantoro analysisofthereasonsforthejudgesdecisionwhichrelievesdefendantsincorruptioncases
AT ariesisnandar analysisofthereasonsforthejudgesdecisionwhichrelievesdefendantsincorruptioncases
AT ucukagiyanto analysisofthereasonsforthejudgesdecisionwhichrelievesdefendantsincorruptioncases