An Analysis of Students Error In Solving PISA 2012 And Its Scaffolding
Based on PISA survey in 2012, Indonesia was only placed on 64 out of 65 participating countries. The survey suggest that the students’ ability of reasoning, spatial orientation, and problem solving are lower compare with other participants countries, especially in Shouth East Asia. Nevertheless, the...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | UMS Journal (OJS) |
| Language: | eng |
| Published: |
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/jramathedu/article/view/3380 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1805342437711806464 |
|---|---|
| author | Sari, Yurizka Melia Valentino, Erik |
| author_facet | Sari, Yurizka Melia Valentino, Erik |
| author_sort | Sari, Yurizka Melia |
| collection | OJS |
| description | Based on PISA survey in 2012, Indonesia was only placed on 64 out of 65 participating countries. The survey suggest that the students’ ability of reasoning, spatial orientation, and problem solving are lower compare with other participants countries, especially in Shouth East Asia. Nevertheless, the result of PISA does not elicit clearly on the students’ inability in solving PISA problem such as the location and the types of student’s errors. Therefore, analyzing students’ error in solving PISA problem would be essential countermeasure to help the students in solving mathematics problems and to develop scaffolding. Based on the data analysis, it is found that there are 5 types of error which is made by the subject. They consist of reading error, comprehension error, transformation error, process skill error, and encoding error. The most common mistake that subject do is encoding error with a percentage of 26%. While reading is the fewest errors made by the subjects that is only 12%. The types of given scaffolding was explaining the problem carefully and making a summary of new words and find the meaning of them, restructuring problem-solving strategies and reviewing the results of the completion of the problem. |
| format | UMS Journal (OJS) |
| id | oai:ojs2.journals.ums.ac.id:article-3380 |
| institution | Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta |
| language | eng |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publisher | Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta |
| record_format | ojs |
| spelling | oai:ojs2.journals.ums.ac.id:article-3380 An Analysis of Students Error In Solving PISA 2012 And Its Scaffolding Sari, Yurizka Melia Valentino, Erik Mathematics Education Analysis of Student’s Error, PISA, Newman Analysis, Scaffolding Based on PISA survey in 2012, Indonesia was only placed on 64 out of 65 participating countries. The survey suggest that the students’ ability of reasoning, spatial orientation, and problem solving are lower compare with other participants countries, especially in Shouth East Asia. Nevertheless, the result of PISA does not elicit clearly on the students’ inability in solving PISA problem such as the location and the types of student’s errors. Therefore, analyzing students’ error in solving PISA problem would be essential countermeasure to help the students in solving mathematics problems and to develop scaffolding. Based on the data analysis, it is found that there are 5 types of error which is made by the subject. They consist of reading error, comprehension error, transformation error, process skill error, and encoding error. The most common mistake that subject do is encoding error with a percentage of 26%. While reading is the fewest errors made by the subjects that is only 12%. The types of given scaffolding was explaining the problem carefully and making a summary of new words and find the meaning of them, restructuring problem-solving strategies and reviewing the results of the completion of the problem. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta Indonesian Directorate General of Higher Education (DIKTI) 2017-08-03 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion qualitative research application/pdf https://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/jramathedu/article/view/3380 10.23917/jramathedu.v1i2.3380 JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education); Vol. 1, No. 2, July 2016; 90-98 2541-2590 2503-3697 10.23917/jramathedu.v1i2 eng https://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/jramathedu/article/view/3380/2130 Mathematics education learning mathematics student ability Copyright (c) 2017 Yurizka Melia Sari, Erik Valentino http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| spellingShingle | Mathematics Education Analysis of Student’s Error, PISA, Newman Analysis, Scaffolding Sari, Yurizka Melia Valentino, Erik An Analysis of Students Error In Solving PISA 2012 And Its Scaffolding |
| title | An Analysis of Students Error In Solving PISA 2012 And Its Scaffolding |
| title_full | An Analysis of Students Error In Solving PISA 2012 And Its Scaffolding |
| title_fullStr | An Analysis of Students Error In Solving PISA 2012 And Its Scaffolding |
| title_full_unstemmed | An Analysis of Students Error In Solving PISA 2012 And Its Scaffolding |
| title_short | An Analysis of Students Error In Solving PISA 2012 And Its Scaffolding |
| title_sort | analysis of students error in solving pisa 2012 and its scaffolding |
| topic | Mathematics Education Analysis of Student’s Error, PISA, Newman Analysis, Scaffolding |
| topic_facet | Mathematics Education Analysis of Student’s Error, PISA, Newman Analysis, Scaffolding |
| url | https://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/jramathedu/article/view/3380 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sariyurizkamelia ananalysisofstudentserrorinsolvingpisa2012anditsscaffolding AT valentinoerik ananalysisofstudentserrorinsolvingpisa2012anditsscaffolding AT sariyurizkamelia analysisofstudentserrorinsolvingpisa2012anditsscaffolding AT valentinoerik analysisofstudentserrorinsolvingpisa2012anditsscaffolding |