ERRORS ON ORAL PRODUCTION MADE BY ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS AT UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SURAKARTA

The objectives of this research are to describe the types of error, to analyze the frequency of error and to describe the source of error in oral productions made by English department students in microteaching class at Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. The type of this study is descriptive qualit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Saputri, Rismanita Ayu Eka
Format: UMS Journal (OJS)
Language:eng
Published: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta 2016
Online Access:https://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/humaniora/article/view/2510
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1805338284213141504
author Saputri, Rismanita Ayu Eka
author_facet Saputri, Rismanita Ayu Eka
author_sort Saputri, Rismanita Ayu Eka
collection OJS
description The objectives of this research are to describe the types of error, to analyze the frequency of error and to describe the source of error in oral productions made by English department students in microteaching class at Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. The type of this study is descriptive qualitative research. The data of this research are utterances containing errors taken from Microteaching video. The data collection technique of this research is documentary study. There are 289 utterances containing error. The writer uses descriptive qualitative technique to analyze thedata. The writer uses theories from Clark and Clark, Dulay, Burt and Krashen and also Selinker to analyze the error. In the result of this study, the writer divided types of error into three classifications. They are speech error, morphological error, and syntactical error. Speech error (80,28%), in speech error divided into seven types, they are: filled pause (39,5%), repeats (18,34%), silent pause (10,73%), stutters (6,57%), interjection (2,08%), correction (1,73%), slip of tongue (1,38%). Morphological (13,84%) in morphological error divided into three types, they are: Omission of Bound morpheme {-s} as plural marker (2,77%), pronunciations (8,30%), vocabulary(2,77%). Syntactical error (5,88%), syntactical error divided into four types, they are: omission of modal {will} (1,38%), omission of preposition (1,38%), question construction (1,38%), incorrect word selection (1,73%). The sources of error arecognitive reason, psychological reason and social reason.
format UMS Journal (OJS)
id oai:ojs2.journals.ums.ac.id:article-2510
institution Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
language eng
publishDate 2016
publisher Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
record_format ojs
spelling oai:ojs2.journals.ums.ac.id:article-2510 ERRORS ON ORAL PRODUCTION MADE BY ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS AT UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SURAKARTA Saputri, Rismanita Ayu Eka The objectives of this research are to describe the types of error, to analyze the frequency of error and to describe the source of error in oral productions made by English department students in microteaching class at Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. The type of this study is descriptive qualitative research. The data of this research are utterances containing errors taken from Microteaching video. The data collection technique of this research is documentary study. There are 289 utterances containing error. The writer uses descriptive qualitative technique to analyze thedata. The writer uses theories from Clark and Clark, Dulay, Burt and Krashen and also Selinker to analyze the error. In the result of this study, the writer divided types of error into three classifications. They are speech error, morphological error, and syntactical error. Speech error (80,28%), in speech error divided into seven types, they are: filled pause (39,5%), repeats (18,34%), silent pause (10,73%), stutters (6,57%), interjection (2,08%), correction (1,73%), slip of tongue (1,38%). Morphological (13,84%) in morphological error divided into three types, they are: Omission of Bound morpheme {-s} as plural marker (2,77%), pronunciations (8,30%), vocabulary(2,77%). Syntactical error (5,88%), syntactical error divided into four types, they are: omission of modal {will} (1,38%), omission of preposition (1,38%), question construction (1,38%), incorrect word selection (1,73%). The sources of error arecognitive reason, psychological reason and social reason. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta 2016-10-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/humaniora/article/view/2510 10.23917/humaniora.v17i2.2510 Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora; Vol 17, No 2: Agustus, 2016; 185-193 2541-4496 1411-5190 eng https://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/humaniora/article/view/2510/1687 Copyright (c) 2016 Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora
spellingShingle Saputri, Rismanita Ayu Eka
ERRORS ON ORAL PRODUCTION MADE BY ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS AT UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SURAKARTA
title ERRORS ON ORAL PRODUCTION MADE BY ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS AT UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SURAKARTA
title_full ERRORS ON ORAL PRODUCTION MADE BY ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS AT UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SURAKARTA
title_fullStr ERRORS ON ORAL PRODUCTION MADE BY ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS AT UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SURAKARTA
title_full_unstemmed ERRORS ON ORAL PRODUCTION MADE BY ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS AT UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SURAKARTA
title_short ERRORS ON ORAL PRODUCTION MADE BY ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS AT UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SURAKARTA
title_sort errors on oral production made by english department students in microteaching class at universitas muhammadiyah surakarta
url https://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/humaniora/article/view/2510
work_keys_str_mv AT saputrirismanitaayueka errorsonoralproductionmadebyenglishdepartmentstudentsinmicroteachingclassatuniversitasmuhammadiyahsurakarta