ERRORS ON ORAL PRODUCTION MADE BY ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS AT UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SURAKARTA
The objectives of this research are to describe the types of error, to analyze the frequency of error and to describe the source of error in oral productions made by English department students in microteaching class at Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. The type of this study is descriptive qualit...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | UMS Journal (OJS) |
Language: | eng |
Published: |
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
2016
|
Online Access: | https://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/humaniora/article/view/2510 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1805338284213141504 |
---|---|
author | Saputri, Rismanita Ayu Eka |
author_facet | Saputri, Rismanita Ayu Eka |
author_sort | Saputri, Rismanita Ayu Eka |
collection | OJS |
description | The objectives of this research are to describe the types of error, to analyze the frequency of error and to describe the source of error in oral productions made by English department students in microteaching class at Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. The type of this study is descriptive qualitative research. The data of this research are utterances containing errors taken from Microteaching video. The data collection technique of this research is documentary study. There are 289 utterances containing error. The writer uses descriptive qualitative technique to analyze thedata. The writer uses theories from Clark and Clark, Dulay, Burt and Krashen and also Selinker to analyze the error. In the result of this study, the writer divided types of error into three classifications. They are speech error, morphological error, and syntactical error. Speech error (80,28%), in speech error divided into seven types, they are: filled pause (39,5%), repeats (18,34%), silent pause (10,73%), stutters (6,57%), interjection (2,08%), correction (1,73%), slip of tongue (1,38%). Morphological (13,84%) in morphological error divided into three types, they are: Omission of Bound morpheme {-s} as plural marker (2,77%), pronunciations (8,30%), vocabulary(2,77%). Syntactical error (5,88%), syntactical error divided into four types, they are: omission of modal {will} (1,38%), omission of preposition (1,38%), question construction (1,38%), incorrect word selection (1,73%). The sources of error arecognitive reason, psychological reason and social reason. |
format | UMS Journal (OJS) |
id | oai:ojs2.journals.ums.ac.id:article-2510 |
institution | Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta |
language | eng |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta |
record_format | ojs |
spelling | oai:ojs2.journals.ums.ac.id:article-2510 ERRORS ON ORAL PRODUCTION MADE BY ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS AT UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SURAKARTA Saputri, Rismanita Ayu Eka The objectives of this research are to describe the types of error, to analyze the frequency of error and to describe the source of error in oral productions made by English department students in microteaching class at Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. The type of this study is descriptive qualitative research. The data of this research are utterances containing errors taken from Microteaching video. The data collection technique of this research is documentary study. There are 289 utterances containing error. The writer uses descriptive qualitative technique to analyze thedata. The writer uses theories from Clark and Clark, Dulay, Burt and Krashen and also Selinker to analyze the error. In the result of this study, the writer divided types of error into three classifications. They are speech error, morphological error, and syntactical error. Speech error (80,28%), in speech error divided into seven types, they are: filled pause (39,5%), repeats (18,34%), silent pause (10,73%), stutters (6,57%), interjection (2,08%), correction (1,73%), slip of tongue (1,38%). Morphological (13,84%) in morphological error divided into three types, they are: Omission of Bound morpheme {-s} as plural marker (2,77%), pronunciations (8,30%), vocabulary(2,77%). Syntactical error (5,88%), syntactical error divided into four types, they are: omission of modal {will} (1,38%), omission of preposition (1,38%), question construction (1,38%), incorrect word selection (1,73%). The sources of error arecognitive reason, psychological reason and social reason. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta 2016-10-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/humaniora/article/view/2510 10.23917/humaniora.v17i2.2510 Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora; Vol 17, No 2: Agustus, 2016; 185-193 2541-4496 1411-5190 eng https://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/humaniora/article/view/2510/1687 Copyright (c) 2016 Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora |
spellingShingle | Saputri, Rismanita Ayu Eka ERRORS ON ORAL PRODUCTION MADE BY ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS AT UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SURAKARTA |
title | ERRORS ON ORAL PRODUCTION MADE BY ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS AT UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SURAKARTA |
title_full | ERRORS ON ORAL PRODUCTION MADE BY ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS AT UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SURAKARTA |
title_fullStr | ERRORS ON ORAL PRODUCTION MADE BY ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS AT UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SURAKARTA |
title_full_unstemmed | ERRORS ON ORAL PRODUCTION MADE BY ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS AT UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SURAKARTA |
title_short | ERRORS ON ORAL PRODUCTION MADE BY ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS AT UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SURAKARTA |
title_sort | errors on oral production made by english department students in microteaching class at universitas muhammadiyah surakarta |
url | https://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/humaniora/article/view/2510 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saputrirismanitaayueka errorsonoralproductionmadebyenglishdepartmentstudentsinmicroteachingclassatuniversitasmuhammadiyahsurakarta |